https://jason-grey.com/tags/requirements/Recent content in Requirements on jason greyHugoenSat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000https://jason-grey.com/posts/2026/requirements-skill/Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000https://jason-grey.com/posts/2026/requirements-skill/<h1 id="open-sourcing-requirements-skill-lightweight-ai-assisted-requirements-maintenance"> Open-Sourcing requirements-skill: Lightweight AI-Assisted Requirements Maintenance <a class="heading-link" href="#open-sourcing-requirements-skill-lightweight-ai-assisted-requirements-maintenance"> <i class="fa-solid fa-link" aria-hidden="true" title="Link to heading"></i> <span class="sr-only">Link to heading</span> </a> </h1> <p>I just open-sourced a project I have been using to keep requirements work cleaner in fast, AI-assisted coding cycles:</p> <ul> <li>Repository: <a href="https://github.com/jt55401/requirements-skill" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener">github.com/jt55401/requirements-skill</a></li> <li>Latest release: <a href="https://github.com/jt55401/requirements-skill/releases/tag/v0.2.0" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener">v0.2.0</a></li> </ul> <h2 id="the-problem"> The Problem <a class="heading-link" href="#the-problem"> <i class="fa-solid fa-link" aria-hidden="true" title="Link to heading"></i> <span class="sr-only">Link to heading</span> </a> </h2> <p>AI-assisted teams can ship quickly, but requirement docs often drift from reality. The common failure modes are predictable:</p> <ol> <li>broken links between requirements and tickets</li> <li>duplicate or overlapping stories</li> <li>conflicting acceptance criteria</li> <li>weak traceability between requirement intent and actual implementation</li> </ol> <p>Once this drift accumulates, teams lose confidence in requirements as a source of truth.</p>